“Daft” sighting

“This book’s footnotes are whatever the opposite of scholarly is, many of them completely daft.”–Dwight Garner, New York Times, November 6, 2012, review of “Bruce [Springsteen],” by Peter Ames Carlin

6 thoughts on ““Daft” sighting

  1. .

    …….. a bit like “daffy” – as in “Daffy Duck”.

    I venture that it’s the same root meaning, but not so new, (except in the UK where it is almost unused), unlike “daft”, which is used all the time and has been for many decades.


  2. “Daft” was very much a typically Northern term like “gormless” not that many decades ago (I can remember when it spread south), and the OED still has it as (chiefly) Scottish and Northern. It was a split from “deft” during the Middle English period, both words originally meaning “gentle”. “Daffy” is “dialect or slang” from a much more recent time (first cited 1884, in England) and may or may not be related. It has to be said, though, that these entries have not been updated since 1894 and 1933 respectively!

  3. I’ve heard it used in speech as a person being eccentric, generally in a harmless or amusing way, as in: “Callahan is daft. He was talking about social media again.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s